Global Economic Growth Slows Amid Gloomy and More Uncertain Outlook

The global economy, still reeling from the pandemic and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, is facing an increasingly gloomy and uncertain outlook. Many of the downside risks flagged in our April World Economic Outlook have begun to materialize.

Higher-than-expected inflation, especially in the United States and major European economies, is triggering a tightening of global financial conditions. China’s slowdown has been worse than anticipated amid COVID-19 outbreaks and lockdowns, and there have been further negative spillovers from the war in Ukraine. As a result, global output contracted in the second quarter of this year.

Under our baseline forecast, growth slows from last year’s 6.1 percent to 3.2 percent this year and 2.9 percent next year, downgrades of 0.4 and 0.7 percentage points from April. This reflects stalling growth in the world’s three largest economies—the United States, China and the euro area—with important consequences for the global outlook.

In the United States, reduced household purchasing power and tighter monetary policy will drive growth down to 2.3 percent this year and 1 percent next year. In China, further lockdowns, and the deepening real estate crisis pushed growth down to 3.3 percent this year—the slowest in more than four decades, excluding the pandemic. And in the euro area, growth is revised down to 2.6 percent this year and 1.2 percent in 2023, reflecting spillovers from the war in Ukraine and tighter monetary policy.

Despite slowing activity, global inflation has been revised up, in part due to rising food and energy prices. Inflation this year is anticipated to reach 6.6 percent in advanced economies and 9.5 percent in emerging market and developing economies—upward revisions of 0.9 and 0.8 percentage points respectively—and is projected to remain elevated longer. Inflation has also broadened in many economies, reflecting the impact of cost pressures from disrupted supply chains and historically tight labor markets.

The risks to the outlook are overwhelmingly tilted to the downside:

The war in Ukraine could lead to a sudden stop of European gas flows from Russia

Inflation could remain stubbornly high if labor markets remain overly tight or inflation expectations de-anchor, or disinflation proves more costly than expected

Tighter global financial conditions could induce a surge in debt distress in emerging market and developing economies

Renewed COVID-19 outbreaks and lockdowns might further suppress China’s growth

Rising food and energy prices could cause widespread food insecurity and social unrest

Geopolitical fragmentation might impede global trade and cooperation.

In a plausible alternative scenario where some of these risks materialize, including a full shutdown of Russian gas flows to Europe, inflation will rise and global growth decelerate further to about 2.6 percent this year and 2 percent next year—a pace that growth has fallen below just five times since 1970. Under this scenario, both the United States and the euro area experience near-zero growth next year, with negative knock-on effects for the rest of the world.

Policy priorities

Inflation at current levels represents a clear risk for current and future macroeconomic stability and bringing it back to central bank targets should be the top priority for policymakers. In response to incoming data, central banks of major advanced economies are withdrawing monetary support faster than we expected in April, while many in emerging market and developing economies had already started raising interest rates last year.

The resulting synchronized monetary tightening across countries is historically unprecedented, and its effects are expected to bite, with global growth slowing next year and inflation decelerating. Tighter monetary policy will inevitably have real economic costs, but delaying it will only exacerbate the hardship. Central banks that have started tightening should stay the course until inflation is tamed.

Targeted fiscal support can help cushion the impact on the most vulnerable. But with government budgets stretched by the pandemic and the need for an overall disinflationary macroeconomic policy stance, offsetting targeted support with higher taxes or lower government spending will ensure that fiscal policy does not make the job of monetary policy even harder.

As advanced economies raise interest rates to fight inflation, financial conditions are tightening, especially for their emerging-market counterparts. Countries must appropriately use macroprudential tools to safeguard financial stability. Where flexible exchange rates are insufficient to absorb external shocks, policymakers will need to be ready to implement foreign exchange interventions or capital flow management measures in a crisis scenario.

Such challenges come at a time when many countries lack fiscal space, with the share of low-income countries in or at high risk of debt distress at 60 percent, up from about 20 percent a decade ago. Higher borrowing costs, diminished credit flows, a stronger dollar and weaker growth will push even more into distress.

Debt-resolution mechanisms remain slow and unpredictable, hampered by difficulties in obtaining coordinated agreements from diverse creditors over their competing claims. Recent progress in implementing the Group of Twenty’s Common Framework is encouraging, but further improvements are still urgently needed.

Domestic policies to address the impacts of high energy and food prices should focus on those most affected without distorting prices. Governments should refrain from hoarding food and energy and instead look to unwind barriers to trade such as food export bans, which drive world prices higher. As the pandemic continues, governments must step up vaccination campaigns, resolve vaccine distribution bottlenecks and ensure equitable access to treatment.

Finally, mitigating climate change continues to require prompt multilateral action to limit emissions and raise investment to hasten the green transition. The war in Ukraine and soaring energy prices have put pressure on governments to turn to fossil fuels such as coal as a stopgap measure. Policymakers and regulators should ensure such measures are temporary and only cover energy shortfalls, not increase emissions overall. Credible and comprehensive climate policies to increase green energy supply should be accelerated urgently. The energy crisis also illustrates how a policy of clean, green energy independence can be compatible with national security objectives.

The outlook has darkened significantly since April. The world may soon be teetering on the edge of a global recession, only two years after the last one. Multilateral cooperation will be key in many areas, from climate transition and pandemic preparedness to food security and debt distress. Amid great challenge and strife, strengthening cooperation remains the best way to improve economic prospects and mitigate the risk of geoeconomic fragmentation.

Three Basic Economic Problems

All modern economies have certain fundamental or basic economic problems to deal with. In every single economy, including the so-called “affluent society”, resources are limited. As a result, decisions regarding the resource use have to be made together by individuals, by business corporations, and by society.

It is the social choice and community preferences which give substance to the question of macro-economic decisions.

Three Basic Economic Problems of Society

Following figure shows the 3 fundamental economic problems faced by all societies worldwide.

1. What to produce ?

Each and every economy must determine what products and services, and what volume of each, to produce. In some way, these kinds of decisions should be coordinated in every society. In a few, the govt decides. In others, consumers and producers decisions act together to find out what the society’s scarce resources will be utilized for. In a market economy, this ‘what to produce?’ choice is made mainly by buyers, acting in their own interests to fulfill their needs. Their demands are fulfilled by organizations looking for profits.

For instance, if cellphones are in demand it will pay businesses to produce and sell these. If no one desires to buy radio sets, it is not worth producing them.

In case a manufacturer produces an item which buyers don’t buy in much quantity, there will likely be inadequate income. The manufacturer will have to enhance the quality and modify the product to match buyer tastes. If the item is still not preferred, the producer will most likely halt the production. In this manner, buyers get the goods they need.

Customers rule the ‘what?’ decision. They ‘vote’ for certain products and services by spending money on those they like. Each and every manufacturer has to offer what buyers want so that they can compete effectively against other manufacturers. Government authorities also perform some part in making ‘what?’ decisions. For example, a law demanding all ladies to wear a helmet generates demand for helmets, and profit-seeking businesses will produce them.

Read More: What to Produce?

2. How to produce ?

This basic economic problem is with regards to the mix of resources to use to create each good and service. These types of decisions are generally made by companies which attempt to create their products at lowest cost. By way of example, banking institutions have substituted the majority of their counter service individuals with automatic teller machines, phone banking and Net banking. These electronic ways of moving money, utilizing capital as opposed to labour resources, have decreased the banks’ production costs.

In the Nineteen fifties dams were being constructed in China by countless people making use of containers and shovels. On the other hand dams were being constructed in the united states by using huge earth moving devices.

The initial approach to production, using a resource combination which includes a small capital and much labour, is labour-intensive while the second, utilizing a little labour and a lot of capital, is capital-intensive. Each one of these ‘how’ decisions was made based on lowest cost and accessible modern technology.

Read More: How to Produce Goods and Services?

3. For whom to produce ?

This basic economic question is focused on who receives what share of the products and services which the economy produces. The portion of production which each person and family can consume is determined by their income. Income is distributed in line with the value of resources we have to sell.

As an example, a top cricket player will earn far more income than a professor. A top cricket player has a resource to sell for which many people will pay a high price. Professors are not so rare, and few people pay for their services.

The for whom decision can even be dependent upon skills shortages, in which case organizations will provide higher incomes to attract workers with rare skills. In the same way, high wages may be required to attract employees to rural locations.

Video: What are the Three Basic Economic Problems ?

The economic problem is at times referred to as the basic, central or fundamental economic problem. It is one of the crucial economic theories in the functioning of any economy in this world. Due to scarcity, choices have to be made by consumers, businesses and governments.

Scarcity can be caused by the possible lack of availability in resources, from individuals insatiable desires, or from a combination of the two. Due to the fact that resources are scarce and many of our desires are substantial, a choice needs to be made about how to use scarce resources in the most effective way.

This rule is applicable to companies, society as a whole, and to individuals. This article has discussed the 3 fundamental economic questions or three basic economic problems common to all societies. If anything is missing please post in the comments section.

Significance of economy and economic problems in the global world

ECONOMY

The significance of the economy and economic problems is great in today’s global world: so far the market has dictated its conditions to all spheres of human activity. Economic relations, material values and commercial profit considerations form the basis of national and corporate interests. This means that economic processes have a direct influence on the environment and security, social development and the implementation of scientific-technical achievements. Global problem solutions depend on the level and direction of economic activity, because they have an economic nature.

The following global economic problems have serious significance for the world economy and national economic systems, civilisation development, international relations and the environment:

Most common natural resource management technologies remain inefficient; some to them are barbaric, inflicting great harm to the environment;

Hydrocarbon energy, which brings considerable damage to the Earth’s crust and atmospheric air, still dominates the fuel and energy complex of most countries;

Mineral fuel consumption growth leads to globalising the energy problem, while tying the value of money and pricing mechanisms to the price of energy resources creates instability in currency and stock markets;

The space (linear) type of economic evolution leads to increasing consumption of all types of natural resource, and growing production waste and consumption levels, which accelerate the worsening of the environmental situation;

Transportation and logistics development levels lag behind the development levels of production and e-commerce;

Widening income discrepancy between the most developed economies and the least developed economies, which affects the quality of life in these countries;

Growing unemployment in developing countries; labour migration lacks any system, order or manageability;

Poverty is growing in many developing countries proportionately to population growth and associated food shortages;

Over recent years, growing military expenses have unfavourably affected national economies, the world economy, and contradicted planetary needs; they have led to the deformation of the normal functioning of economic systems (they are: stalling industrial-technological development; increasing budgetary deficit; encouraging inflation; diverting human and other resources from solving pressing socio-economic problems; and negatively affecting international relations and aggravate tension between nations);

Most countries have not yet been able to fulfil the potential of their human resources.

As practice shows, the group of economic problems prove to be the most complicated compared to other global problems of the modern world. This is because economic contradictions and difficulties underlie all existing and emerging global problems. The problem of overcoming poverty, and the disparity of the standard of living in developed and developing countries is being resolved very slowly. Efforts made in this regard have little effectiveness due to: inflation; high population growth in Third World countries; incorrect schemes and methods of calculating the poverty line; a minimum standard of living; and the international poverty level etc. The most important factor is that the very practice of so-called government and international help to the poor is superficial and futile, because it changes nothing in the actual genetic foundations of the problem, and its reproduction mechanisms.

The efforts of the scholarly and business communities, politicians and public leaders should be directed at resolving global economic problems.

We urge users of our website, who share Planetary Project ideas, to let us know what your analysis and assessment of global economic problems are and propose solutions.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.